Talk:Something's Gotta Give (film)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
References to use
[edit]- Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
- Radner, Hilary (2010). "Something's Gotta Give (2003): Nancy Meyers, Neo-Feminist Auteur". Neo-Feminist Cinema: Girly Films, Chick Flicks, and Consumer Culture. Routledge. ISBN 0415877733.
- Tally, Margaret (2007). "Something's gotta give: Hollywood, female sexuality, and the 'older bird' chick flick". In Ferriss, Suzanne; Young, Mallory (eds.). Chick Flicks: Contemporary Women at the Movies. Routledge. pp. 119–131. ISBN 0415962552.
1962 film?
[edit]Wha does it mean : "It is not to be confused with the unfinished 1962 film of a similar title." ?? --88.106.114.175 23:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Somethings gotta give.jpg
[edit]Image:Somethings gotta give.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:A432somethings gotta give.jpg
[edit]Image:A432somethings gotta give.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
60-somethings?
[edit]Diane Keaton plays 56-year-old Erica Barry, right? So why does the opening paragraph say that she and Jack Nicholson play two successful 60-somethings? I'm also too addle-brained to figure out how to say "two successful late-middle-aged people" more smoothly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Collinpark (talk • contribs) 03:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Factual error in plot description
[edit]During the rehearsal Erica is undecided about the fate of the Henry character. It is half a year later that Harry learns from Marin about the death of the character and is somewhat consoled by her husband with the remark about the laugh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.43.62 (talk) 11:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Something's Gotta Give (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100503040155/http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/m/somethings_gotta_give/ to http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/m/somethings_gotta_give/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://connect.afi.com/site/DocServer/10top10.pdf?docID=381&AddInterest=1781
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Two Soundtracks Claim - Legitimate?
[edit]I've found no evidence for there being a longer soundtrack issued by Warner Bros. Only the Columbia Records version seems to exist in the various places I've looked: Discogs.com, Ebay.com, Amazon, Spotify, and Billboard. Since there is no citation for this information provided in the article, I think it should be deleted. Ww adh77 (talk) 14:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)