Talk:Somalia at the 2016 Summer Paralympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 08:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Somalia was one of six countries to make their first appearance in the Paralympic Games: the others were Aruba, Congo, Malawi, São Tomé and Príncipe and Togo. I think that should be a semicolon, since it is separating two sentences.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Add the trans-title parameter to relevant citations
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Was copied from here, no concern.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	The committee had attempted to recruit a goalball team composed of blind athletes but a lack of time meant they failed to qualify for the Games. Did they manage to compose a team and did not have time to qualify, or did they fail to compose a team at all?
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Yup
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

@Kees08: I have taken action on the points you have raised. MWright96 (talk) 09:27, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]