Talk:Solway Group

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mining

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Western Asia: Cyprus Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Cyprus portal This article is supported by WikiProject Cyprus.

Untitled

This article is pure propanganda, please see who last updated it : Redaut, and the only other article made by this contributor: "Alexander Bronstein"

This is cearly an attempt from the company solway or some employees to wash the company public image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.247.165.10 (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your claims are mostly untrue. There is no need to launder the company's image. A large-scale investigation was conducted, and the company was sanctioned due to the unproven facts cited earlier. If you pay attention - most of the previously made negative and misinforming edits were based on speculation and assumptions. The investigation also proved that some of the Wikipedia editors who made these edits acted as commissioned editors - paid editors paid by detractors. And plus, please note. In correcting this article with new facts and data. I did not delete the information added by these bribed editors. I only added the already known and published information. About which these editors (many of them, by the way, are "one-dayers" and even have already been removed from Wikipedia) "modestly" kept silent. Which clearly led to the "one-sidedness" of information presentation. Redaut (talk) 11:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So given the above facts and the persistence of previous "criticism" of the company, by underhanded authors. I did not delete their edits. I kept them. Exclusively supplemented with new facts. What if this does not show the neutrality of the material? Both positive points, criticism and different points of view have been preserved. Redaut (talk) 11:45, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with you. Completely misses the point of the claim. The article is neutral. It leaves out both criticism and facts. When you put templates about non-neutrality (POV) - be kind - write justification, not your personal assumptions and speculations. Otherwise, if I were the author, I would take it as a call to remove all criticism and bring the article to just neutral status with just simple numbers and facts. NewOrlean (talk) 12:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]