Talk:Solomon Islands at the 1988 Summer Olympics/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Bennv3771 (talk · contribs) 12:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
I'll do this. This is my first GA review so bear with me if I make any mistakes. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- See below
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- No images, but given the topic there are probably none readily available.
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Short and sweet article. I'll pass this once the below issues are addressed.
- Pass or Fail:
Comments:
This was the island nation's second time .... following their debut four years earlier.
"four years earlier" is currently a piped link to 1984 Summer Olympics. Given this refers specifically to Solomon Islands' debut, I think readers would be expecting to be directed to Solomon Islands at the 1984 Summer Olympics instead.In his three attempts ... making his final mark for that portion 85 kilograms, and in 24th place.
- Missing comma after "In his three attempts"
- "and in 24th place" doesn't sound right to me. Perhaps replace with "which put him in 24th place" or "putting him in 24th place".
In his third attempt ... and in 22nd place.
- Replace "and in 22nd place" as well
--Bennv3771 (talk) 13:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- Bennv3771, changes made, thanks for the review! Courcelles (talk) 14:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Courcelles: Thanks for the quick response. Passed. Bennv3771 (talk) 14:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
- Bennv3771, changes made, thanks for the review! Courcelles (talk) 14:44, 12 August 2018 (UTC)