Talk:Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument (Indianapolis)/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument (Indianapolis). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Content Addition
FOR SOMETHING AS IMPORTANT AS THIS, THIS SHOULD BE A LITTLE MORE LEGNTHY!<333 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DDavis092 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 7 December 2006.
- I added updated content for the History section as well as subheadings and a more-detailed description of the monument's exterior and its notable sculptures.Rosalina523 (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
- It would be great if someone could add some current, close-up images of the monument's sculptural details to the article.Rosalina523 (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Original research
I'd like to pitch in to this article, but can't do so without discussing the similarity between some of the sculpture on the monument and a work created by François Rude for the Arc de Triomphe in Paris. I have never seen this connection made before (tho it probably has been discussed somewhere) - making this the kiss-of-death original research. I probably can supply pictures to back this claim but am not going to do so if it's just going to get removed. So, I'm looking fo a second (3rd, 4th and 5th would be good too) opinion. eeeek aka 19:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Make sure you can find at least 1 reference for this, it might help if you read through this first. HoosierState 20:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back to me. I am fairly well acquainted with wikipedia's views of original research and frequently choose to use them as guideline and not rules. The rather small pond of American Sculpture Research frequently does not provide the documentation that are needed to fully explain things such as this monument. So I do what I can and am in some cases overruled, or speedily deleted or whatever, but mostly am not. However when folks point the rules at me I typically decide not to contribute. Life is too short and there are too many other things to do where my knowledge and understanding of American sculpture is appreciated. Anyway, thanks for your prompt and direct reply to my query. Carptrash (talk) 20:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- There's also the fifth pillar Wikipedia:Ignore all rules... In this case, though, I'm not sure what connection you'd draw between the monument in Indianapolis and the Arc de Triomphe, which was built 90 years earlier on a different continent. Mingusboodle (talk) 01:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- The connection between the two, from my perspective, has to do with the design of some of the sculpture. Looking at pictures and comparing the two make a compelling (opinion) argument, but "compelling arguments" do not carry much weight here. Carptrash (talk) 02:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Title wrong?
I'm not sure why this article is "Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument". This spelling is not used in either the [State's website] or the [NPS' website]. Further, a quick search of my bookshelf returns a published spelling like the one used here in WP. If there is no compelling reason and citation for the possessive nature of this spelling, it should be changed immediately. --Richard McCoy (talk) 17:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- the Smithsonian data base calls it the Soldiers and Sailors Monument with an alternate title of Indiana Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument. Since the article has been like it is for years I'm not sure why "changed immediately" is the way to go - I'd like to get home and check my book shelf too, but a good title for a page is important. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ha, ha. Well immediately to me, just means soon--and not just something to mull over. Which Smithsonian database? I note in [Save Outdoor Sculpture!] database that elements within the piece don't have the possessive. See here.
This is what I was looking at. [1]. This article here seems to be pretty short of sculptors, but that can be fixed too. Immediately (your time). Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Looks like a rename is in order! —Charles Edward (Talk | Contribs) 01:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Governor's Circle
The governor's circle encompassed by the 80 foot street contains 2 acres not 3 acres as described in History section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.165.112.113 (talk) 15:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- I tried to find a citation that documents the acreage as 2 instead of 3 acres, but the ones I found said, if anything, 3 acres. If there is another source that supports the Circle's size as a 2-acre lot, you might want to add it to the article's content with an inline reference, and making a range as a 2 to 3-acre plot of land, for example. Rosalina523 (talk) 20:53, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument (Indianapolis). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091112193053/http://www.wishtv.com:80/dpp/news/local/marion_county/Monument_repairs_taking_longer_than_expected_20091111 to http://www.wishtv.com/dpp/news/local/marion_county/Monument_repairs_taking_longer_than_expected_20091111
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument (Indianapolis). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wishtv.com/dpp/news/local/marion_county/Monument_repairs_taking_longer_than_expected_20091111
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100126144437/http://www.ulib.iupui.edu/kade/soldiers.html to http://www.ulib.iupui.edu/kade/soldiers.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)