Talk:Solarium Augusti

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Solarium Augusti appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Solarium Augusti in ancient Rome was the largest sundial in history?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/October.

Wikipedia

Largest in the world?

The Sundial Bridge at Turtle Bay has a gnomon over twice the size of the Solarium Augusti, so that would make it the largest sundial of the world. I'll change this article to reflect "ancient" world. AndyBQ 17:24, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links

The external link to the University of Oregon replica needs to be updated to reflect an address change: http://solarium.uoregon.edu/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Apddraig (talk • contribs) 21:19, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After carefully comparing the two Oregon webpages, I think either one (or both) URLs are appropriate. The shorter URL is newer, but no change is absolutely necessary. -- Apddraig (talk) 04:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Solarium Augusti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120530141305/http://www.uark.edu/ua/metis2/zanker/zanker_txt2.html to http://www.uark.edu/ua/metis2/zanker/zanker_txt2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]