Talk:Solar dynasty

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Solar dynasty article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 90 days

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Sourcing

Further to my note above from some years ago regarding a clean up, things seem to have actually got worse. Certainly in the last 3 or 4 months, people have been changing sourced information and I'm not at all convinced that they have actually read the sources because the info has been changed more that once, eg: the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian problem in the paragraph citing Mazumdar. I'm tempted to revert this thing back for years unless someone starts providing quotes (here, not in the article) so we can all see what is going on. - Sitush (talk) 10:10, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

incorrect transliteration done by @Getsnoopy's

This is incorrect transliteration done by @Getsnoopy's Hunterian scheme doesnot translate to 'm'. Hence Raghuwamsh is incorrect. Please revert the change. Wait for making any changes to anything related to Suryavanshi or Raghuvanshi.

Ref : Latest revision as of 02:23, 20 February 2022 (view source) Getsnoopy (talk | contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neha.thakur75 (talk • contribs) 05:23, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Continue the discussion at Talk:Raghuvamshi. There is no value in discussing what is fundamentally the same issue on multiple Talk pages simultaneously. General Ization ^Talk 14:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to tag the issue on this page. The user should be aware of the discussion going on the transliteration done by the user Getsnoopy. Stop challenging with out understanding the context please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neha.thakur75 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A user would not have been aware of the discussion at Talk:Raghuvamshi without a link to that discussion, which I added above. Once again, you may not instruct other editors not to participate in Talk page discussions. General Ization ^Talk 16:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]