Talk:Sol de Mañana
Sol de Mañana has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 25, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Sol de Mañana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: DimensionalFusion (talk · contribs) 20:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
This article looks pretty good at a cursory glance, can't wait to get into it
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- References are appropriately listed and consistently formatted.
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- Inline citations are fully appropriate and back up the corresponding claims
- c. (OR):
- Article does not contain any original resource
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- The article does not contain any copyright violations
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- The article addresses the main aspects of the location and goes into appropriate detail
- b. (focused):
- The article does not go into unnecessary detail on any particular topics
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article does not lend any undue weight to any opinions
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit warring as far as I can tell
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Media is used really well in this article and is suitably sourced from wikimedia commons
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All media is fully relevant to the topic
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- This is definitley a great article, and I really enjoyed the use of media
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
Featured picture scheduled for POTD
[edit]Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Sol de Mañana 2018.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 03, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-08-03. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Aviafanboi (talk) 14:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)