Jump to content

Talk:Sol Levi/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: I found zero disambiguations. Well Done!

Linkrot: I found zero dead links. Well Done!

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose) : b (MoS) :
    One thing, the lead is a bit messy maybe split it into two paragrpahs and maybe add a caption for the picture?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All references are fine and no original research. Though there is no reception though looking on websites there isnt actually any which I can find either. MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Thorough and well focussed
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Maybe this is picky, on the development of Sol you could put a picture of Cole like with Vanessa Gold. MayhemMario (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Every thing is good, so I am happy to list this as a Good Article. Congratulations! MayhemMario (talk) 18:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]