Talk:Software quality management
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Swong97.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
recent edits
[edit]AKoszlajda: I hope it will be ok right now. If there is something more, what I should do. Please let me knoe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akoszlajda (talk • contribs) 23:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- The content may or may not have been alright, I didn't read it at all. What I saw was large quantities of prose without any references. That's a concern. I recognize that other articles may be like this, we should endeavour to clean those up and add references where possible, but the second of the Wikipedia:five pillars is that material has to be verifiable and preferably supported by reliable sources. I'm sorry that I had to remove the material. How can I help you add material that is acceptable to these guidelines? Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:38, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
AKoszlajda: Actually you did :) I hope it already good right now. Is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akoszlajda (talk • contribs) 23:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC)