Talk:Software copyright in China

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Intricate detail

While this page on software copyright in China receives the warning that there's too much intricate detail, I'm not sure if that's unavoidable given (i) copyright law is tricky, and (ii) the original text in Chinese is difficult for non-English speakers.

I wouldn't want to see the content deleted, as this text was helpful to me as a starting point. Sure, it could be rewritten better, but it's a place to start. Daviding (talk) 15:48, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Level of detail

Looking at the article it seems like the majority of it may be a translation of whatever the native Chinese law is, what with the "Article [Number]" at the beginning of many sentences. Now, I don't think I'm the right person to try to fix this, as I don't have a great understanding of copyright law or Chinese, but hopefully this can draw a tiny more attention to the article's problems. FieryRaven (talk) 15:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]