Talk:Soft Light (The X-Files)

Soft Light (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Soft Light (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 30, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
October 3, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: The X-Files Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force.

Page move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was No Move Duja► 10:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose page move to Soft Light. Insufficient disambiguation between the existing Soft light (lower-case "l") and this article, if renamed. Soft Light should remain as it is at present - a redirect to the most common use of the term, Soft light. --Ckatz^chat _spy 07:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think people would expect the soft light article and not an episode article. 70.51.9.86 05:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per my anon brother. When I think of soft light, I think of the photography term. It is clearly ambiguous. 205.157.110.11 22:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soft Light (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 02:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Match with other X-Files article by linking season 2, then removed the other lists at the very bottom of the infobox
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

Episode can't really "premiered" how about "originally aired"
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The episode received mostly positive reviews from television critics. → The episode generally received positive reviews from television critics.
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"like". Isn't really a word you want here. How about "such as"
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

Nothing; Huh 0)

Production

"huge" is not needed; same for "even" kind of WP:NPOV
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Who was it directing by ;( James A. Contner is very sad right now. Lol
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcast and reception

"Soft Light" was first broadcast in the United States on May 5, 1995, on the Fox Broadcasting Company → "Soft Light" originally aired on the Fox network on May 5, 1995.
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
UK airing, perhaps?
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

Ref. 6: "Sci-Fi Blast From The Past - Tony Shalhoub (The X-Files)" The - should be an en dash as per WP:DASH.
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ref. 6: How is that a good source
Firstly, it's a primary source-based interview, so its notable. Secondly, the author is a regular contributor to Andrew Morton's website/newspaper, The Morton Report, so he isn't just a random crackpot Link--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Fox Broadcasting Company", not "corporation"
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ref. 9: Doubled periods with Time, Inc., which should be Time, Inc
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links

on TheXFiles.com should use "at"
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"The X-Files Wiki, an external wiki". Repetitive. How about: "The X-Files, an external wiki"
Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On hold. Good work. TBran dl ey 17:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There, I believe I've gotten everything. Thank you for the review.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will pass the artcle. Congrats! TBran dl ey 23:14, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant critique

The last segment of the critique section references a page that is no longer being maintained. Additional research being necessary to assess the significance of this critic, which doesn't seem readily available as the critic is not noteworthy themselves, seems to suggest this is a trivial segment and should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:5602:B943:1C2F:21BC:4AD:6F32 (talk) 10:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]