Talk:Soft/Rock
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I removed the following text because a Google search did not give any results that there is such 12 copies. There are RUMORS that there is 12, 15, 30 copies like this, but only rumors. Suggest that the part is kept out untill proof is given that the special edition exists (Did not find em on EBay either...)
However, 12 of the original 1000 copies slipped through the net. These were the first twelve copies ever made and had a different sleeve design. Fred Deakin and Nick Franglen (the duo that are Lemon Jelly) originaly wanted all 1000 vinyls in denim sleeves. They told an embriodery artist (Laura Lees) to go to the market and buy enough Levis to cover all 1000. They wanted the soft rock symbol stamped on one side, embriodery around the stamp, and symbols stiched all over the cover. However, after the number twelve, Laura Lees told Lemon Jelly's duo that all 1000 would simply take too long. So they then continued with the above format. These special 12 had the business card of Laura Lees in the pocket of the jeans instead of the flavoured condom put in the pocket of the 988 others. This is know as the rarest Lemon Jelly vinyl ever released.
Oyvind 08:16, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- I suggest that you could have left the factual evidence - namely that Laura Lees was indeed the artist - I've discussed this on your talk page. Budgiekiller 08:20, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- Okay, I've checked it out with the people that know (they've spoken to Nick and Fred about it in the past - [1]) and this disputed content is just about spot on. Here's a picture of what the really limited edition versions look like - [2] and [3]. I suggest this disputed content is re-written into appropriate Wiki format, and then replaced into the article. Budgiekiller 10:06, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- No problems with that. Some link's should do fine! Oyvind 12:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, I've checked it out with the people that know (they've spoken to Nick and Fred about it in the past - [1]) and this disputed content is just about spot on. Here's a picture of what the really limited edition versions look like - [2] and [3]. I suggest this disputed content is re-written into appropriate Wiki format, and then replaced into the article. Budgiekiller 10:06, 23 November 2005 (UTC)