Jump to content

Talk:SodaStream

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1984 Sydbrand lawsuit

[edit]

In the gas canisters section it says, "In Sweden in 1984, carbonic acid supplier Sydbrand, primarily a supplier of fire equipment, was sued successfully by SodaStream". Shouldn't that read "successfully sued by W & A Gilbey Ltd."? Since SodaStream wasn't it's own company until 1991 and, at that time, was a subsidiary of W & A Gilbey Ltd.? I'm not an expert in Swedish law so I figured I'd ask. Robo042 (talk) 01:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on SodaStream. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Factory move

[edit]

I'm not sure where @Hyperionsteel: sourced the information about PACBI in this edit, the content that has just been removed here, but Al Jazeera's "SodaStream factory shows Palestinian Bedouins' plight" article covers this in some detail including for example BDS co-founder Omar Barghouti saying "This closure is a clear-cut BDS victory against an odiously complicit Israeli company" and explaining that "The BDS campaign against SodaStream will continue, as the company is moving to a location where it is directly colluding in the ethnic cleansing of Bedouin Palestinian citizens of Israel in the Naqab [Negev]." and that Sodastream CEO Daniel Birnbaum "admitted BDS had played some role in the move" which he described as "minimal". There is plenty of other information in this and other sources to ensure the issues are given a detail and weight that is in proper proportion to the coverage by RS, as is required by mandatory policy. Sean.hoyland - talk 11:44, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


mechanism of operation

[edit]

{{User:Northamerica1000]] is right--without this paragraph the article does not make sense. It was easy enough to source. DGG ( talk ) 05:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on SodaStream. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit review

[edit]

Would someone with more experience mind reviewing this edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SodaStream&curid=4153354&diff=921269808&oldid=917931961&diffmode=source). I'm not sure about whether the wording by the editor should be used? Thank you. Daylen (talk) 04:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Checking whether the source given uses the word "alleged" is all the review that's needed. If it does, the edit's probably fine; otherwise, it should be reverted (or another source found). In this instance, the latter seems to be the case. 78.28.45.145 (talk) 08:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Missing end quote?

[edit]

was reading the article and happened to notice a missing end quote in the controversy section. the quote as-is reads "Birnbaum said that the factories are apolitical. "We don't take sides in this conflict. He described the factory as "building bridges between us and the Palestinian population, and we provide our Palestinian employees with respectable employment opportunities and an appropriate salary and benefits"." however, i believe there should be an end quote after 'conflict' because the article switches back to referring to birnbaum in the third person, and proceeds to quote a different section from the source article, without appearing to be part of a larger quote from a different source. thanks for your time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.43.203.181 (talk) 16:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Take My Breath Away (Soda Club song)" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Take My Breath Away (Soda Club song). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 17#Take My Breath Away (Soda Club song) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bottle 'licensing'?

[edit]

I'm surprised that there's no explanation as to what that means on the bottle, and it sounds dubious enough to want to know yet they don't explain what they're really claiming, specifically. Is it for having the trademark on the bottle? DOT shipping requirement (i.e. you're not supposed to ship refilled bottles unless Sodastream if I understand it right)? Can't be patents as it's even on the ancient design. Seems to run right into first sale and exhaustion issues among others, if they try to claim ownership. It's beginning to feel like the Nintendo Seal of Quality, all over again. 74.196.181.80 (talk) 20:56, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:SodaStream&oldid=1210438536"