Jump to content

Talk:Sociodicy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Response to DoubleGrazing comment about paywalled sources

[edit]

Since "sociodicy" is a scientific (at least social scientific) term, many of the sources are indeed behind paywalls. But not all of them are. And, in any case, many wikipedia articles necessarily refer to paywalled sources. Still, if you google 'sociodicy' you get a decent number of hits, with enough public sources to get a sense of the thing. Plus, the article as written refers to many wikipedia articles about relevant scholars and sources. My own sense, having encountered this word in a NYT article, was that it warranted an entry in wikipedia. 198.55.233.67 (talk) 14:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]