Talk:Society for Science

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Society for Science article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Magazines

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

A fact from Society for Science appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 September 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Science Service used to broadcast information from its Science News magazine on the radio?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/September.

Wikipedia

No longer weekly

Science News hasn't been published weekly in some time. It is bi-weekly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.49.109 (talk) 00:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Science News for Students

not enough for a separate article DGG ( talk ) 16:35, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move to Society for Science

At some time in the past, the Society for Science & the Public seems to shortened its name to "Society for Science". Unless someone has a good reason to keep the old name, I propose to move this article to the current name for the society. Vaughan Pratt (talk) 00:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vaughan Pratt, I agree. I'm going to go ahead and move the article. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:31, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Three weeks was more than enough time for any stakeholders to raise objections. Thanks for doing this. Vaughan Pratt (talk) 19:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]