Talk:Society for Research on Biological Rhythms

Update needed

There are a number of out of date pieces of information on this page (c.f. https://srbr.org/). I will endeavour to add updates in the near future. B82mo (talk) 12:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have begun a sandbox here User:B82mo/sandbox/SRBR B82mo (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My reworked leader and organisation section should have answered the advertisement issues. I suggest that particular warning can be removed in two weeks unless there is disagreement? B82mo (talk) 20:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

http://www.science.tamu.edu/news/story.php?story_ID=946#.WOqZM1MrKRs

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/a-blog-around-the-clock/clocks-metabolism-evolution-toward-an-integrative-chronobiology/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by E.hsu (talk • contribs) 20:27, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bioclocker, E.hsu, Ldyvrws65egd3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I tagged this article for notability because it was, and still is, difficult to deduce notability from the text. There are very many references for distinguished members and for relevant research, but it is strangely lacking for the Society itself. The "Scientific American" piece referenced above looks a good starter and should be a source in the opening paragraph, but a few more like that are still needed. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]