This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
I'm just going to say right here that this is why I continually despair of the Wikipedia. The 'notability' policy is one that raises the bar for marginalized groups and issues. The 'verifiability' policy is so broad as to be meaningless. A scholarly society's membership, whether it's a hundred or ten thousand, can only be verified through the society's own records. Since the SMFS holds it annual meeting at a conference notable enough for its own Wikipedia article (the International Congress on Medieval Studies), and sponsors sessions there and at two other specifically medieval conferences with their own Wikipedia articles the International Medieval Congress and Medieval Academy of America, AND is an affiliate of two major scholarly societies, the Modern Language Association and the American Historical Association, AND publishes a peer-reviewed journal whose articles are regularly cited in scholarly works -- not to mention on the Wikipedia, where there are also articles on individual feminist scholars who belong to SMFS and/or have contributed to its journal -- it seems absurd to have to prove it's 'notable'. The evidence exists in the Wikipedia itself, even if the society's basic information does not suffice per se. ex-JHK (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
