Talk:Social spider

Move to Social spiders

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 09:15, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Social spider → Social spiders — Discussing multiple spider species Strageser (talk) 07:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Singular titles are preferred. Johnbod (talk) 18:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: I do not think this fits into the Exceptions criteria at WP:Naming conventions (plurals). [|Retro00064|☎talk|✍contribs|] 02:00, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Rating

Shouldn't his page be of mid-importance? Just saying. 88.148.223.130 (talk) 05:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, & it's clearly not a stub. Johnbod (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stylistics

Well, it may be a lost cause, but I still like to see simple language. It helps the less-expert reader, and makes for easier translation into other languages. For example: "These 23 species are phylogenetically scattered in 11 genera in eight widely separated families". Instead "These 23 species are in 11 genera from eight widely separated families". Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:31, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Useful addition to article

It would be useful to give readers an idea of how large spider colonies tend to be.

I hope someone knowledgeable about this topic can add this information to the article. 2601:200:C000:1A0:F128:3DA5:B358:8B47 (talk) 18:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]