Talk:Social Repose

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 May 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

A Cappella Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject A Cappella, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of a cappella (professional and collegiate) and related articles such as its groups, recordings, institutions, and public figures on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.A CappellaWikipedia:WikiProject A CappellaTemplate:WikiProject A CappellaA Cappella articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Sources

Looks like we will need to find some form of news report, I am guessing that YouTube videos are considered to be a biased source?92.24.43.252 (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily biased per se, but usually a primary source, and generally not preferred, especially for contentious content about living persons. GMG ^talk 17:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is there another source we could use? 92.24.43.252 (talk) 19:27, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has exceptionally high standards for sources when it comes to content about living people. This is partially because we want to ensure we don't do any harm with the content we write, and also because it's one of a few areas that can actually get Wikipedia sued. Generally, you're looking for published independent sources, usually things like books, newspapers, and magazines (along with their websites), and not things like videos or user generated content like blogs or online comment threads. If this kind of content about recent events does not yet exist, then it's usually a good indication that this may be an event that is especially important at the moment to dedicated fans, but isn't necessarily central to providing an enduring encyclopedic overview of the subject. GMG ^talk 19:43, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do his own videos not count as sources? I assume the questions here regard whether or not his recent cheating scandal can be verified. He has posted videos at least twice on the matter (edit: e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0EaTLRYM1o) and has admitted to the cheating. There are also various recordings of him describing the matter during livestreams with fans. Given the self-verification, it seems strange that there's no mention of such a significant event on his biography. At this point, he is probably more famous on the whole for the affair than for his music. 24.16.14.230 (talk) 01:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting This Wikipedia Page For Social Repose

This person doesn't belong on here he hasn't done anything spectacular or anything special to belong on here and feel like it should be deleted PeterPan1838 (talk) 09:33, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the criterion is "noteworthy", not "spectacular". I don't like the guy, but neither of us would be here if he hadn't achieved "noteworthy" status. Besides, he's certainly made a spectacle of himself of late, so he really passes either test. 24.16.14.230 (talk) 01:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jaclyn Glenn Social Repose

Jaclyn Glenn has stated on Twitter that she does not want to be included with anything that has to do with her ex Richard Giese AKA Social Repose that is why I keep editing her name out of his Wikipedia page so hope the people that keep including her in something she doesn't want to be included in will be decent and stop mentioning her on his Wikipedia page PeterPan1838 (talk) 03:26, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's something that still defines his career and is noteworthy at minimum. She's been featured in many of his videos and was his wife at one point. Although it technically wasn't a legal marriage, it still happened. The breakup between them has changed his career ever since. I won't put that information in because I don't know all the details, but I think not allowing Jaclyn Glenn to even be mentioned on Richard Geise's Wikipedia page is unnecessary censorship. Nochekai (talk) 16:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]