Talk:Sober Living by the Sea
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
COI
[edit]See Mhurst08 (talk · contribs) and Mhurstcrc (talk · contribs). — Athaenara ✉ 01:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Possible merge??
[edit]Would this page be better suited if the information was merged into the page on CRC Health Group? Just a thought. --RTotzke (talk) 18:24, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. If CRC is around? I just found out this business, Sober Living By The Sea is no longer active. The domain name is a redirect to a different business, not Sober Living By The Sea. Or it can just be deleted because it no longer exists? Chris Giller (talk) 14:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Advertisement?
[edit]Does anyone here see a need for this place to be here? They are a rehab and there are 100 others in Orange County. This seems like an attempt for SEO and ranking purposes only. If they are here, every other rehab in the nation should be allowed to have their own page. There's nothing that makes SLBTS special or different than the rest except for maybe the fact that they could afford to pay someone to create a page for them and fight for their right to advertise here. There are at least 100 others in this area with history too. Chris Giller (talk) 21:11, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Much of this page was content taken from their website. And there are many rehabs that are a part of the MORN issue. To list then all would be ridiculous. SLBTS is a rehab and is not special in any way. I saw this wiki page popup while doing an unrelated search for a client that sells cannabis. It looked like an ad. There's no reason for this to show up in search results for "cannabis"-related sales. After hours of investigation into the links and citings, two of them were links to 404s and more than half the article is missing references. This seems like an advertisement and most of the content was taken from the websites pitch. I think we should remove it, but didn't think I had the right to. So I removed the content that was missing references and specifically stated "citing needed" after searching for anything to backup the content and finding nothing but content on their website itself. Chris Giller (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2022 (UTC)