Jump to content

Talk:So Seductive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSo Seductive has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 22, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:So Seductive/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Infobox

[edit]
  • No issues

Lead

[edit]

Background

[edit]

Writing and composition

[edit]

Critical reception

[edit]
  • No issues

Music video

[edit]
  • No issues

Live performances

[edit]
  • No issues

Awards and nominations

[edit]

Track listing

[edit]
  • No issues

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • No issues

Charts

[edit]
  • No issues

Radio and release history

[edit]
  • No issues

References

[edit]
  • No issues


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are some minor prose issues among others that are keeping this article from reaching good article status. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not concern good article status, until a consensus is reached. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 06:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel comfortable passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 17:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]