Talk:So Awkward

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Can i please add a table for series 3 86.178.226.82 (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This is not the right page to request additional user rights.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - Not sure what the above was on about but anyway Series 3 doesn't air not until June apparently so until that time comes the article can live without one, Come back in June. –Davey2010^Talk 19:55, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Expiry Date

The expiry date has passed. It did so on Christmas Day, so why is the page still semi-protected?77.97.55.147 (talk) 20:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The semi-protection does not run out until 16 January 2018. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

}} Looks like this== Semi-protected edit request on 3 April 2018 ==

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

92.2.249.78 (talk) 21:30, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — IVORK _Discuss 22:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@92.2.249.78: You need to discuss your proposed changes and back them up with reliable sources. Here-to-for your edits have been unsourced and disruptive.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:01, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

92.2.249.78 - As explained on your talkpage the deal with myself and the IPs was this - The content could stay PROVIDING IT WAS COMMENTED OUT/HIDDEN - Not to be devious but it allowed the episode list to be updated as and when pleased and it was also out of view so the whole "RV as unsourced" was non-existent ....... You for whatever decided this rule didn't apply to you and as such the deal was undone and the article was protected which now means no IPs can edit it ..... So your actions have now led to this entire section being empty/non-existent - As demonstrated 92 you can either work with us or against ..... however against results in this,

Just to explain on this "deal" - Due to constant issues I figured the comment out option was the best approach as none of the IPs were vandals - They're just over-enthusiastic and like to add everything before it airs .....,

Locking the page stops the unsourced edits but it also means all IPs come at once - try to edit the article - and make a hash of it all which means more editors time on reverting them and or fixing the table(s) ..... So with the hidden/unlocking way everything runs more smoothly and it generally means less editors time on fixing everything .....,

Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 01:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]