Talk:Snow camouflage
Appearance
Snow camouflage has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 14, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Snow camouflage/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 13:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, I'll review this soon. First thought, the photo of the willow grouse could benefit form being right aligned; now it interferes with the table, which is pushed to the right, unlike the two other tables. Also, it is better for subjects in photos to face the text. FunkMonk (talk) 13:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Interesting reasons! Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- When it comes to snow camouflage in animals, you only seem to focus on seasonal camouflage. What about polar bears, snow owls, Arctic wolves, etc? Seems like an oversight.
- OK, Added a mention of always-white Arctic animals, and an image. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Alright, but the intro should not have unique info, only be a summary of the article body, so there should be elaboration further down. FunkMonk (talk) 12:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- It's all in the Among animals section.
- It would seem that having the "White as camouflage" section before "Seasonal polyphenism" would make more sense? It explains what the camouflage is for in general, whereas the seasonal stuff is more specific. FunkMonk (talk) 12:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- It's all in the Among animals section.
- Alright, but the intro should not have unique info, only be a summary of the article body, so there should be elaboration further down. FunkMonk (talk) 12:59, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Done.
- OK, Added a mention of always-white Arctic animals, and an image. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- No pre-WW2 examples of snow-camouflage?
- There's very little, as it was generally improvised, but I've found brief refs and a nice image from the IWM.
- The title "Snow camouflage in animals" seems a bit too general, since all the examples shown are only those that change coat.
- Seasonal polyphenism it is.
- Maybe you could elaborate on the different reasons why animals would need snow camouflage. I wouldn't think polar bears or wolves are afraid of other predators, so it must be to aid in hunting?
- Done, you agree with Cott!
- Nice fixes, I'll pass, seems more well-rounded now. FunkMonk (talk) 21:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the review, and Happy Easter! Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- GA-Class Evolutionary biology articles
- Low-importance Evolutionary biology articles
- WikiProject Evolutionary biology articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles