Talk:Snow King Mountain

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Wyoming portal This article is supported by WikiProject Wyoming.

Skiing and Snowboarding Mid‑importance

	Sports portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Snow King Mountain Resort (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Notability

Why not to delete: historic Western US ski area, first in Jackson Hole by decades.

Add some content to demonstrate why this ski area is notable per WP:N and it might have a chance. – ukexpat (talk) 21:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 April 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. OK, however http://snowkingmountain.com/about-snow-king/ indicates that the official name is Snow King Ski Area and Mountain Resort. Wbm1058 (talk) 22:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Snow King Resort → Snow King Mountain – The current page title is conflicting with trademark issues of another property in the local area ("Snow King Resort - http://www.snowking.com"). The content of the article references the property as "Snow King Mountain", however, the page title is "Snow King Resort". When users search for "Snow King Resort" in Google, The search engine results page is showing the knowledge graph for Snow King Mountain resulting in a poor user experience. In order to increase the benefit and relevance of both properties, I am requesting a name change from "Snow King Resort" to "Snow King Mountain". Snow King Mountain's Website - http://snowkingmountain.com Impvd (talk) 17:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional... (But it used to be - and I have extensively researched, removed and reformatted the sections which were devoted to blatant promotion (times, prices, excessive lists, flowery speech, etc). Just yesterday I began the section Community Resistance after finding many many reliable news sources which document events and activities which could only be characterized as "bad press" to an article which is actually spam/promotion. In addition to this I just identified the copyright violation yesterday from the source https://www.tetoncountywy.gov/DocumentCenter/View/2808/Snow-King-Area-Report-PDF and was quickly working on a rewrite of the History sections instead of simply blanking the article. The WP:COPYPASTE is easily identified (once I found the paper) and retained within the boundaries of the History section and is grounds for a section delete NOT a complete elimination of the article. The irony here is that the document being referred to was generated as part of the official historical evaluation of Snow King which was indeed found to be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places^[1]. This article is important and should not be deleted --Luke Kindred (talk) 17:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.outsideonline.com/1964086/parts-snow-king-mountain-deemed-historic

[1] ttps://www.outsideonline.com/1964086/parts-snow-king-mountain-deemed-historic

[1]