Talk:Snow Hill lines
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Snow Hill Lines RDT. |
Disambiguation?
[edit]My view is that this isn't a true disambiguation page, as it lists articles which when grouped together are termed under this name. As such, the disambig template should be removed. Any thoughts? Alzarian16 (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. Also, we need a source for this usage. Alarics (talk) 14:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Good point. I've found several semi-official uses of the term (Network West Midlands, Advance Train Tickets, Warwickshire Investment Partnership and Birmingham City Council all use it), but none of them actually defines which lines it applies to. There's a case to be made that this is redundant to the individual line pages. Alzarian16 (talk) 14:55, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Snow Hill Lines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.londonmidland.com/your-journey/journey-planning/a-new-era-for-the-snow-hill-lines/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)