Talk:Snohomish River

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article needs a map.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

The real Snohomish watershed

This article should probably has data on the complete Snohomish/Skykomish/Snoqualmie watershed. Saying it's 20 miles long and drains a small area from Monroe to Everett is not quite right, since it actually also drains a big chunk of the Cascades through the two other rivers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.57.220.63 (talk) 21:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flow rates

Peak flow at USGS 12150800 (Monroe Gage) was Nov. 25, 1990 at 150,000 cfs.[1] The tabulated annual averages may be averaged to obtain 9523 cfs.[2] --Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:41, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]