Talk:Snafu Comics

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 4 July 2022, see discussion.
no consensus, 12 May 2012, see discussion.
keep, 1 May 2008, see discussion.
no consensus, 16 May 2006, see discussion.

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Webcomics.

Pictures removed why??

Ok what was the reason the pictures for PPGD and GTFDB being removed? probably for efficiency, but that doesn't seem like a good reason anyway

editing the article

This article is a mess due to all the deletions and merges. This article is too long, follows too many topics, and they are all told in too rushed a fashion.
I think we need to rewrite some of the articles. Smile Lee 18:01, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the PPGD doujin section should be completely rewritten and shortened, and should provide only two character descriptions for Grim Jr. and Mini Mandy and the rest would be cut. If people wanted to know about the characters so much they'd read the comic, and the comic has not achieved mass notoreity, so describing the characters is just clogging the page. But just as well, the comic has very dedicated but also immature readers as part of its fanbase, and they will edit the webpage to include as much as possible. However as previously said, the character list should be done away with and describe only the protagonists, also a better way to organize all the comics should be made, if you scroll through the page it starts to look the same and indistinguisable.Zach 04:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact the entire Bleedman section should have a cleanup tag on it I.M.O.Zach 04:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

do we even need a bleedman section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.87.49 (talk) 22:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we do, but it needs serious cleanup and shortening, and me happening to only be interested in the comics solely besides Bleedman, I really dont want to be the one to have to cleanup that section and then mess it up.Zach 22:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this page, particularly Bleedman's section, needs to be redone. I attempted to add somethind to the Sugar Bits article earlier, but that has mostly been removed and replaced by someone describing each and every comic individually in a very unporfessional manner (I.E.: Using the word 'dude).

I'm going to try and take on shortening Bleedman's section. Let me know if anyone wants to help. Glotnot 21:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Charecter info

The charecter Lists for PPGD is unneeded and cluters the pages, Please do not add it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.47.78.172 (talk) 16:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC) (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comics Note

"In the past, Snafu also hosted Digital Purgatory and This Comic Sucks. Its current features include the following."

Yeaaaaaaaaaah they're still on the site."This Comic Sucks" has been renamed to "Awful" and it has been stated in the strips.

"Fluffy Doom A new addition to the site. So far, it is only in preview mode, but it has shown a guy answering a want ad for a cult."

Not on the site

Overall I think this article needs to be overhauled and updated. --207.162.187.75 (talk) 06:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Can't anyone find a better picture than Mario's p***s enlarging? Not a particularly good reflection on the site --203.122.242.99 (talk) 06:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Herms

Is Matt Herms really getting a divorce?

Herms

Is Matt Herms really getting a divorce? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.190.205 (talk) 23:38, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really notable?

There are plenty of sections in this article with zero references. If nobody has anything to say about these comics then why are they listed? Hcobb (talk) 07:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No response, so I second the deletion. Hcobb (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Snafu Comics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]