Jump to content

Talk:Smashburger/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 23:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This is a very well written article all around. I'm fascinated by retail and fast food history, and I found this article highly informative and well-presented.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I did a couple minor fixes to remove some grammar and formatting errors.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
    Very extensively sourced. I saw no citation errors or unreliable sources at all.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    I feel that the article gives a very thorough description of the chain's history, especially given how new a chain it is overall.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I could see this being a potential FA one day. Again, very well written article all around.