Talk:Smashburger/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 23:22, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
This is a very well written article all around. I'm fascinated by retail and fast food history, and I found this article highly informative and well-presented.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Very extensively sourced. I saw no citation errors or unreliable sources at all.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- I feel that the article gives a very thorough description of the chain's history, especially given how new a chain it is overall.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I could see this being a potential FA one day. Again, very well written article all around.
- Pass/Fail: