Talk:Smalltail shark/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 08:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

First of all can I say that I have never heard of the Smalltail shark, so its interesting to read for that fact alone.

• No disamb links no action required
• External links checked no action required
• In the lead 2–9 young should be two to nine
  • Done.
• Same in the Biology and ecology section litters of 2–9 (typically 4–6) young
  • Done.
• The ISBN for Castro, J.H. (2011). The Sharks of North America needs fixing
  • Done.

Well done some small points to fix or discuss. I have put a seven day hold on the review to enable users to address any points. Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 20:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)