Talk:Small Wars Journal

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Old Edits

Redited and took out the non-approved links - did not know about that - Facebook and Twitter links are now removed.

Tidied first sentence under “Smalls Wars” heading and added quotation marks to identify the quote from Clausewiz. SanchoAnchovy (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted “The Small Wars Journal embraces that imperfection.” That is for the reader to decide. SanchoAnchovy (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted “Just as friendly fire isn’t, there isn’t necessarily anything small about a Small War.” This is irrelevant unless expanded into a larger examination of what constitutes a “small war”. SanchoAnchovy (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted “…is not a government, official, or big corporate site.” What it ISN’T isn’t important. SanchoAnchovy (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested additions

‘Small Wars Journal’ Tacitly Recommends Assassinations to Salvage Mid East Fiasco (Jewish Press, June 2020)
CJR Blurb
NPR: "Up until now, the most vibrant professional debates have been almost exclusively hosted by privately run websites such as 'Small Wars Journal' and 'Abu Muqawama.'"

Jlevi (talk) 12:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]