Talk:Slumlord/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Slumlord. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Untitled
Are you required to pay rent for the upcoming month if the landlord has not replaced items that could cause hazard to people?
69.54.80.138 (talk) 20:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
NPOV
The operation section appears to contain significant amounts of loaded language without any real way to back up any of those claims. For example, refering to "families with young children sent by local authorities to live in filthy, bed-bug infested properties and rogue landlords making a fortune out of public money" is a very strong statement from a clear point of view that should be indicated as a quote if it is such or reworded if it isn't. Exarion1 (talk) 21:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Slumlord. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060216055514/http://www.rhol.org:80/rental/slumlord.htm to http://www.rhol.org/rental/slumlord.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
The Reactions section is perhaps improperly titled, and speculative at best. It is full of opinions and little factual information.
The two paragraphs contained are argumentative to the point of being pure spin. No studies or citations back up any of these claims. Particularly worrisome is the claim that slumlords are the best buddies of the poor because the poor only care about price, not quality. What kind of bunk is this? It's not up to the standards expected of quality content on Wikipedia and fails the test of common knowledge that the poor do not enjoy living in slums but are forced to, so how does that make the slum lord one of their best friends? Absolute rubbish! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.175.148.221 (talk) 21:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)