Jump to content

Talk:Slumdog Millionaire controversies/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

POV

This article is terribly one-sided. I did a quick google search on one section involving the criticism of the name "slumdog" and quickly came up with another side to the story. It appears that no one has made any effort to find out what the responses are to these criticisms. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

City of God?

I don't see any more similarity of Slumdog with City of God than there is with Oliver! My opinion, of course, doesn't count for anything, without cited verifiable sources. But neither does the opposite opinion, without any cited verifiable sources. I've removed all mention of the supposed similarity to City of God. I also agree that there are serious POV issues, as well as the whole article being a nearly incoherent miscellany. MayerG (talk) 03:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Controversial issues surrounding Slumdog Millionaire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

relationship to source material?

I'm a fan of the novel Q&A, which, admittedly, I only heard of and read due to the success of Slumdog Millionaire. However, after finally seeing the film, I'm a bit shocked. The film picks and chooses what it likes from the novel, and remixes it in some odd ways. To make a rough comparison, it would be like if Sam Gamgee had been made into a minor villain in the film adaptations of The Lord of the Rings, and if they left out the elves and Saruman, and totally reworked the ending. I would suspect that there would be some controversy about the film as an adaptation -- particularly voiced by the author of the original book, despite his obvious conflict of interest. The quotes from Amitabh Bachchan begin to get at the idea, but I'm somewhat surprised there aren't more... hm... Arided (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Connections to Charles Ingram cheating scandal?

Shouldn't Charles Ingram also be mentioned in this article? Some of the plot elements in the film bear resemblance to his cheating incident on the UK version of Millionaire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.156.7.165 (talk) 19:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

It is related, according to this article from The Guardian: [1]. However, it would have a tenuous connection to the present article. Maybe good to mention on the one about the source novel, however. Arided (talk) 01:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)