Talk:Slow earthquake

This level-5 vital article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Slow earthquake is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Earthquakes Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ReidMerrill.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Review by Austin

There is a lot of data in your opening section which is good if someone is coming into the article with some understanding already, but may not be best for an amateur. Might just be an opinion thing.

The causes section is well written but feels a little blocky. Maybe break up one or two sentences so they read easier (ie no compound sentences) so a reader can move through the section without getting tripped up. In general the section is good and i'm just nitpicking.

Locations section -- it might be good to have the name of the faults along which slow earthquakes have occurred in the listed countries so somebody could easily do further research

The figures are good but as Webb discussed doesn't necessarily show the "slow" part of the earthquake. I don't know if a figure like this exists, but something I was thinking of might show the propogation of S or P waves in both a normal and slow earthquake for comparison. The x axis could be time and hopefully this would demonstrate the slow nature of the slow earthquakes. You might even be able to make a graph like this yourself. It wouldnt necessarily need to have S/P waves, just something comparing normal and slow earthquakes with respect to time on the x axis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abenne1 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review by John Martin

I found the introduction to be at a basic-level and easy to read. You do a good job of presenting what a slow-earthquake is and good data to explain magnitudes of these earthquakes.

The causes section does a good job of distinguishing the difference between regular earthquakes and slow earthquakes. I feel like there is some equation to determine slow earthquakes from the way you describe this in causes. If you could add that within this section I think it would be a nice touch.

Like Austin said it would be good to put names to faults for future research and I think one or two more examples of notable slow earthquakes that have occurred.

Review by Logan Adams

Overall, you did a very good job. After just one read through it, I fully understood what a slow earthquake is. The intro could be simplified a little bit so that younger/less knowledgable readers are able to picture it more clearly.

A picture of an area where a slow earthquake has occurred would be cool. That might be difficult to find but would be cool.

A list of slow earthquakes that have occurred would be nice as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladam26 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's slow, then there's slow.

I removed the sentence about tsunamis in the intro. After reading the reference, it's clear that the article is talking about an earthquake that's only "slow " relative to typical earthquakes, with the fault rupture propagating at 1 km/s instead of 3 km/s, but is much more like regular earthquakes than what this article is about. The "slow" earthquake described in that reference is still a fairly sudden event, compared to the slow earthquakes in the article, which rupture at speeds measured in cm/day. Argyriou (talk) 15:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]