Talk:Slope stability

Soil Mid‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Slope stability is within the scope of WikiProject Soil, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.SoilWikipedia:WikiProject SoilTemplate:WikiProject SoilSoil articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Slope stability is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rewrite

Right now, as a Geotechnical Engineer, I'm giving this article a very low rating. There seems to be quite a few of these, and I'm looking at them. I should get around to rewriting soon. --Zeizmic 14:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have rewritten the article with sources. The remediation part is unreferenced and best left to a new slope stabilization article. --Zeizmic 13:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

There seem to be many articles scattered as stubs related to larger ideas in the geotech categories. Should this be merged? For instance, merge the slope stability method stubs into this article? --Zuejay 03:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, I was thinking about doing the same thing, at least for the slope stability methods. I'll do it sometime if you don't. Basar 03:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like we'll need to explain ordinary method of slices as well - probably have to make clear the difference between single-body and slice methods...Ackk!--Zuejay 04:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?

Should this article be renamed Slope stability analysis? There isn't much about earthwork to improve slope stability, and adding that would be a distraction from the analysis material. Argyriou (talk) 15:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming might be dangerous. The more I learn about Wikipedia, the more sensitive it appears as to how you search for a topic. If there is a seperate article on slope stability improvement techniques, we should definitely be linking there. But if it is a stub, maybe it should be incorporated here. --Zuejay 19:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's no slope stabilization article, even though User:Zeizmic suggested one a while ago. If a page move is done using the "move" function, there would be a redirect from Slope stability to Slope stability analysis; which could be changed to a disambiguation page directing people to either the analysis or the stabilization page. Argyriou (talk) 19:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think any of the options would be fine. The mass wasting article covers the qualitative geology, and our one or two articles on slope stability would cover analysis and remediation. I suggest we do two articles with the titles slope stability and slope remediation. Slope stability feels implicitly about analysis to me. The two articles could be offshoots of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, respectively. Basar 23:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI there is a lot of additional information about slope remediation in the article's history from before Zeizmic's rewrite. It might be useful. Basar 00:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overall Organization

Perhaps we should establish a bit of an outline for how this article should go. I definitely like the new TOC. So, it's the intro para; maybe Historical slope stability cases, ie landslides; Methods of analysis (2 major types: single-body & slices; then one or so types of each - for instance, Bishop's is a method of slices type analysis); Stabilization techniques with ref to a main article (if there is one, see Zeizmic's statements above); possibly a See also, like mass wasting; and finally References. What d'ya think? --Zuejay 19:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sonning cutting, request for help

Hello All, I've just started an article on a railway accident caused by a bank-slip at Sonning Cutting in 1841, see Railway accident at Sonning Cutting. The railway engineer, Brunel, spoke at the inquest on the people killed about two types of slip, superficial and deep. I take deep to mean the sort of slip that involves rotational sheering in wet, cohesive soils, but I'm worried about saying this in the article (because I'm not a soils man). If someone could have a look at the article and make comments on the possible causes of the slip, I'd be very grateful. Oh, and what about the soils tipped along the edge of the cutting? Might these have contributed to the slip? Regards, Nick. Nick 10:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Slope stability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040814160329/http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ppv/RPViewDoc?_handler_=HandleInitialGet to http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ppv/RPViewDoc?_handler_=HandleInitialGet&journal=cgj&volume=39&calyLang=eng&articleFile=t02-042.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]