Talk:Slipstream (1989 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edits

I've done a major revision and reduction of this article, which IMO was excessively long and overly detailed. I freely admit I came to this after seeing the movie and *not* liking it - in fact I think it stinks - it's a cheap, rambling, incoherent, hopelessly derivative mess, and no wonder it tanked. I have however endeavoured to maintain a neutral PoV. I have removed a lot of the original plot description, which was IMO very poorly written, far too long (it was practically a scene-by-scene description rather than a summary) and removed a lot of redundancies and 'editorial' comments that made it read like a gushing 'fanboy' blog review. I hope I haven't offended anyone, but I think it needed to be done - way too much attention for what is IMO just a terrible film. I welcome any comments. Thanks Dunks (talk) 01:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]