Talk:Sleuth (2007 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Recent edits

Please do not revert correct citations to incorrect earlier formats. "TBD" is not relevant to anything; the film is not on the schedule for the New York Film Festival, and "to be decided" is not a venue. Information must be documented with reliable and verifiable sources. WP:V#Sources. The prevailing format of this article is full citations (author, title, publication, date of publication, date accessed): WP:CITE. --NYScholar 00:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"References" vs. "External links"

Please see WP:CITE. "External links" are "for further reading" links ONLY, and are separate and distinct from sources used as references for the article itself.

Also, let's please watch the WP:PEACOCK words and phrases. --69.22.254.111 20:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links

See WP:EL for guidelines for External links sections of Wikipedia. --NYScholar 18:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations, violations of WP:V#Sources

Removed copyright violations (WP:Copyvio) added by another user (also previously removed for same reason). Links to copyright-protected content posted on self-published websites without permission are not permissible in Wikipedia. The sources are already listed properly in References section (interview). See the editorial interpolation where the items have been removed for this reason. --NYScholar 18:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not an advertisement for the film

This is an encyclopedia article, not an advertisement or promotional feature article for the film. Statements need documentation with sources that meet WP:V#Sources and that are consistent with the prevailing documentation format in this article; for help, please see WP:CITE and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Please see WP:Advert. Please don't add spam. Thank you. --NYScholar 16:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the Plot?

Most movie entries on Wikipedia have a plot section that summarizes the film. Why doesn't this one? 74.216.112.250 (talk) 23:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

        I second that, where is the plot? Engti (talk) 17:28, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Review section is inaccurate/biased

The review section of this article is inaccurate. It gives many positive reviews from famous sources, but only quotes one negative review. It does reference Rotten Tomatoes, where the film is 36% rotten. It also does not reference Metacritic. These two websites are the most commonly used sources for film reviews one wikipedia. While it is okay to quote positive reviews, this article is very selective. Almost too selective. The one negative review that is quoted has the word "Bomb" bolded to identify it as a bombed review. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/sleuth/ If someone could please edit this, that would be great. I went ahead and marked the section as not being neutral. Mwolvesto50 (talk) 05:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since you obviously took the time to do some research, you could've always *cough* edited it yourself. Jg2904 (talk) 09:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"BOMB" should indeed not be bolded, but it should be retained as ALL CAPS because that is the actual rating Maltin uses, BOMB in all caps.Porterhse (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the Rotten Tomatoes info? I put it back in, took out a positive review from some obscure San Diego rag, and put a couple "negative" reviews (not that they're that negative) in there to balance the positive ones.Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 06:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sleuth (2007 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071101014319/http://www.varesesarabande.com:80/details.asp?pid=vsd%2D302%2D066%2D854%2D2 to http://www.varesesarabande.com/details.asp?pid=vsd%2D302%2D066%2D854%2D2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Sleuth (2007 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]