Jump to content

Talk:Sleeping with the One I Love/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cartoon network freak (talk · contribs) 18:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Probably next week... Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:07, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • May 26, 2016, as the album's second single → remove comma
  • album's second single. It is written and produced → album's second single, written and produced (To avoid repetition)
  • the lyrics revolve around → its lyrics...
  • Commentators compared "Sleeping With The One I Love" → song title is written wrong here
  • responded positively to "Sleeping With The One I Love" → same as above
  • It was Fantasia 10th top-ten → This marked Fantasia's tenth top-ten
  • top-twenty singles → top 20 singles

Infobox

[edit]
  • ALT > A black-and-white image of a woman in a low-cut dress is leaning against a window. The artist's name and the single's title are also included on the image. → ...image of a woman in a low-cut dress who is leaning...

Background and recording

[edit]
  • "Sleeping With The One I Love" was written and produced → ...the...
  • and Steve Genewick did the → while S... handled the
  • Great job with the section!

Composition and lyrics

[edit]
  • Link "DirectLyrics" to SpinMedia + correct name is "Direct Lyrics"
  • "Sleeping With The One I Love" is composed → title
  • Elias Leight of Vogue felt that "Sleeping With The One I Love" → same as above
  • "Sleeping With The One I Love" revolve around Fantasia → title + "revolves"
  • Elle Breezy questioned if the song's → say just "Breezy" as yo have mentioned her before
  • Fantasia explained that the single → use "the singer" here for alternation
  • Fantasia compared "Sleeping With The One I Love" → title
  • "Sleeping With The One I Love" was "a modern sister track" → same as above

Release

[edit]
  • Flawless ;)

Reception

[edit]
  • "Sleeping With The One I Love" received positive → title
  • Kevin Apaza praised the single → just "Apaza" as you have mentioned him before
  • Elle Breezy felt that the single → same as above
  • Matthew Scott Donnelly suggested the song → use "the track" for alternation
  • Jay Cridlin listed "Sleeping With The One I Love" → title
  • "Sleeping With The One I Love" debuted at → title
  • It was Fantasia 10th top-ten → This marked Fantasia's tenth top-ten
  • two top-twenty → two top 20
  • There are too many paragraphs out there; connect the last one with the second one

Music video and live performances

[edit]
  • You can sum up the section's title to "Music video and promotion"
  • The video received positive reviews → say "It" here for alternation
  • Elle Breezy called the video → just "Breezy"
  • (the first in a series of live concerts on the cable channel) → no brackets needed
  • She performed it alongside "It's a Man's Man's Man's World". → connect this with the first sentence: Fantasia performed "Sleeping with the One I Love" — along with "It's..." — during a
  • Year of Fantasia & Anthony Hamilton: Live in Concert in brackets

Track listings

[edit]
  • Remove the "s" from the title, as it's only one listing

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • Unlink "liner notes"
  • Remove ", 19 Recordings, RCA"

Charts

[edit]
  • Flawless ;)

Release history

[edit]
  • Fixed table by myself

Other stuff

[edit]

Copy-violation

[edit]
  • 40.8% is slightly too much. Take a look at the top source and remove some content

References

[edit]
  • As far as I checked them, the references do cover the assertations made in this article

Outcome

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.