Talk:Sleep Room

POV

The present article is full of opinionated, and unsourced froth. The overall style is of a press release, copulated with a rock style, overblown, review. It is not Wikipedian in nature in any light. Frankly the whole article, with copious dead links to nowhere, is arguably of a non-notable subject. Can anyone change my perception ?

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 21:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion is sourced, and quotes are provided. The article is an accurate document of the band's story and does not deviate from the style and content of any other band article available on Wikipedia, of which you are more than welcome to criticise in the interest of equality.

Three dead links are hardly what I would call copious, but in the interest of the band rather than your pseudo-intellectually presented bourgeois standards, I will proceed to restore them.

Seeing as this page experiences reasonable traffic, and the links to this page on the bands official site are clicked with regularity I’d argue it is notable to others, if not yourself.

They exist, are referenced by the BBC and music community site Josaka and have every right to be recorded here on Wikipedia. Sadly, I doubt your perception is open to change, and that you have signed off with a rhetorical question. But hey, should anyone other than you and I read this (no chance at all) at least they will have my defence of the article to sweeten your rather bitter rant.

Ryucoo (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sleep Room. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140310180549/http://fallasleepsnug.com:80/ to http://fallasleepsnug.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:29, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]