This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montenegro, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montenegro on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontenegroWikipedia:WikiProject MontenegroTemplate:WikiProject MontenegroMontenegro articles
Vraneš is 2.29m or 7ft6in. All sources leading to 2.26 are out of date, if new then simply not updated from old. He had to pass 2.26 to reach 2.29. Evlekis (Евлекис) 18:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's as may be but six years on, we have sources stating 2.30 as well as those that still say 2.29 and 2.26 etc. If you find sources from his boyhood you will probably get readings of 2.10 downward. --OJ (talk) 08:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Oranges Juicy: Man what are you doing??? Most reliable sources and almost all list him as 2.29 cm. And they are not outdated... he played last season in the Adriatic league and per their official website he is 2.29 cm, and also Euroleague.net list him with that height. And that are most reliable sources.--Bozalegenda (talk) 20:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The sources are not "out of date" but based on out of date information. You can still find sources that state 2.26. No source here is particularly special, but for what it's worth they are all pretty much equal from what I know. On a personal note (not intended to influence article), you know that people of this man's height are not exactly out of the ordinary in ex-Yu, least of all where Slavko is from. My own background is sport and we have one older man in a certain village on the outskirts of Mostar and he stands 2.30 himself and he and Slavko (who are associated) are bang on the same. I know for a fact he has surpassed 2.29. Anyhow, if we are to move forward we have two options. One is the unprecedented "2.29, or 2.30" with sources, the other is to present our sources for a third opinion and go with that decision. I won't challenge further if it goes to 2.29. But at the moment I cannot allow for what I know to be wrong based on "one source says this, the other says that". --OJ (talk) 16:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
