Talk:Skydiver (ride)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor declined the request. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits.

Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely.

This page was proposed for deletion by SummerPhD (talk · contribs) on 5 November 2012 with the comment:
Not notable. Poorly sourced, permanent stub.

hang on

A major and favorite carnival ride, on par with the Zipper. Has links to it. Does not fit CSD A1 at all. A fine stub. --Knulclunk (talk) 12:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

There is no indication of notability in this article. Yeah, you may have loved it, think it was a "fine ride" or whatever. We need substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. At the moment, the only "source" is, essentially, a blog. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:54, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skydiver vs Sky Diver

The Book of Chance by Harold Chance has Skydiver as one word. Where did you find information that Chance Rides used Sky Diver as two words?—JlACEer (talk) 15:41, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's listed as two words in several sources I came across. One is already cited from a reliable source in the article. and I have yet to add others. 1, 2, 3 are just a few waiting to be inserted. That second one is a technical bulletin, of which I found two others like it, and it may be the most convincing. Sky Diver is the model, but some were probably just named Skydiver as seen in pics online, which may be the reason for the term being used interchangeably in some references. --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now I'm not so sure. This source from 1979 is a big find, and it lists the ride as "Skydiver". Amusement Today also lists it the same way here, which has been posted on the Chance Morgan website. Guess I should revert those changes! It's just weird that there are so many reliable sources that have it as two words. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To me the most compelling source is the book that was written by Harold Chance. I would think he would make sure all the ride names were correct.—JlACEer (talk) 21:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unless, of course, the company purposely changed the name at some point. I would expect both Harold Chance and Chance Rides to get the spelling right! Nevertheless, I agree we should change it back for now. --GoneIn60 (talk) 23:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]