Jump to content

Talk:Sky Witness

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

6th Channel

[edit]

Which channels is it bidding against to become the so-called "6th channel"? I would suggest that Sky 1 was already the "6th channel", behind the standard 5 terrestrial offerings.

Actually ITV2 and ITV3 were the most watched channels after Five last month. Sky1 and Sky Sports 1 are the most watched paid-for channels. With viewing figures less than half than these channels, I cannot imagine how Living TV would be the "6th channel". source: [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.217.67 (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untrue statements of viewing figures

[edit]

I've removed the following text; Most Haunted Live was the most watched show out of every terrestrial and digital channel on Halloween 2004.

Not only is this untrue, it's ridiculous. The show received nearly 3 million viewers, that wouldn't even put it in he Top 10 for Halloween. Shows like Eastenders and Coronation Street regularly get more than 12 million viewers, let's keep this within the realms of reality. 172.209.90.158 18:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New logo, new name

[edit]

Looking at TV Forum people are talking about that LIVINGtv will have a new logo (Image there), and will change its name to just 'Living'. for the luanch of Virgin Media —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AxG (talk • contribs) 10:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Living logo.PNG

[edit]

Image:Living logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


New REF

[edit]

http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/women-s-channel-launched-with-a-crucial-eye-on-controversy-1.745997

Women's channel launched with a crucial eye on controversy


From the archive

Thursday 19 August 1993












A NEW satellite TV station aimed mainly at women was launched yesterday.

UK Living starts broadcasting on September 1 with an investment of #25m and a range of presenters including ex-Eldorado nightclub singer Polly Perkins and EastEnder Michelle Collins.


Head of programmes is Lis Howell, who left GMTV after the station had been on the air for less than two months -- and just three days after former TV-am supremo Greg Dyke became company chairman.

Ms Howell -- who was credited with the invention of GMTV's controversial F-factor for fanciability, said there would be no need for UK Living presenters to have on-screen chemistry -- they are all women.

She was unrepentent about her F-factor policy at GMTV -- but went on: It doesn't apply here because presenters will be operating individually and you can't have sexual chemistry on your own.

But I still think the F-factor is great and I am still a firm believer that appearance on TV matters.

However, the chemistry that will matter here is between the presenter and the audience, and we have thought very carefully about how they should dress, what they should look like, and how they should appeal -- it's crucial.

Ms Howell, 41, said UK Living would have controversial moments because it intended to deal with contentious issues.

A unique aspect will be repeats of programmes such as Kilroy, Anne and Nick, and Floyd, which would be shown within a week of being transmitted on mainstream television.

Currently its sister station, UK Gold, repeats EastEnders and other shows, but episodes can date back several years.

Former TV-am host Kathryn Holloway, 32, who will present an agony aunt programme similar to the Oprah Winfrey Show, admitted that it might shock some of the audience by tackling problems in an adult way.

You might have a mother who comes home and finds her son dressed in her bra and knickers or a mistress talking about how she got involved with the man in her life, Ms Holloway said.

It is not a family channel, it is women talking adult to adult. It will be the nuts and bolts of problems, but within the constraints of the ITC guidelines, which are actually quite broad.

The station was designed neither for a mumsy market nor for rabid feminists as neither extreme reflected the majority of women in Britain, said Ms Holloway.

She pledged that she would look like a real person on-screen rather than the Barbie doll many women were made up to look like for TV cameras.

Women on TV have to be girl-next-door and non-controversial, she said.

Most of them look as if they are in fancy dress. How many women do you know during the day who wear primrose yellow dresses, with big gold buttons?

I look like a real person, there will be no teased hair, no lip-gloss. It's completely inappropriate to have someone looking like they've come off a Dynasty set when they're talking to a victim of a multiple rape.

UK Living is owned by Thames Television and two American broadcasting companies, Cox Enterprises and Tele-Communications Inc.

It will be available on the BSkyB network and to homes connected to cable and will broadcast 18 hours a day, seven days a week. The potential audience is 3.6 million women, although it is also hoped men and teenagers will tune in.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sky Living. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sky Living. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sky Living. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sky Witness which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:31, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a Subsidiary channels section.

[edit]

I added a Extra section for the timeshift channels and and the hd channels Tommy Turnbull (talk) 12:26, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Separate article for Sky Living

[edit]

When Sky Witness replaced Sky living, the content of the channel channel changed from being focussed on programming aimed at women to being more of a crime and reality-based channel. Therefore, I feel that Sky Living and Sky Witness should be covered in separate articles. If there are no objections then I will create a separate article for Sky Living - currently there is a redirect for Sky Living to Sky Witness. Rillington (talk) 13:37, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looking back at when it launched it seems like it was clearly marked as a rebrand, and as others have said the content was already crime shows before the rebrand. I feel like it's been a gradual change in the channel contents, and choosing the name change as the cutoff point is pretty arbitrary. I kind of feel for this reason one article would be better. --Muzer (talk) 13:17, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be quite fair, the channel had already shifted their focus to crime shows even before being rebranded as Sky Witness. I never saw the point of doing a separate article for their former name at all. WhatGuy (talk) 07:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sky_Witness&oldid=1205323285"