Talk:Sky Scrapper

Sky Scrapper has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 19, 2013. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sky Scrapper article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Amusement Parks: Roller Coasters Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Nomination

@Themeparkgc: I've added one review and a quick mention about the coaster never appearing in any polls. I spent nearly an hour searching through google (including the Chinese one which brought up SOME different results but nothing special). I'd say nominate this article and if the reviewer asks about reviews, just say that the only other "semi-review" is what enthusiasts thought of the roller coaster by just watching a POV (see TPR's forum about World Joyland).--Dom497 (talk) 16:12, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a shot. Themeparkgc Talk 22:51, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sky Scrapper/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 23:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC) Review coming soon. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 23:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC) This article passes, however there are two points I wish to address. The first being that, pertaining to the comments made on the article talk page, there is no need for further reviews. Articles are pursuant to the GA criterion, not the Operation B&M template. Secondly, this park is not necessarily unlicensed. Clearly, inspiration is drawn from the WoW franchise, but the resort complex does not utilize the franchise's brands, rather it utilizes derived contrivances, for example, theme park is divided into two separate parks, one being "Universe of Starship" (derived from Starcraft), the other "Terrain of Magic" (once again, derived, but not stolen). It is important to understand derivation is separate from plagiarism. See this source: (World Joyland)[reply]