Talk:Skins (2002 film)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rescue
[edit]Rescue from what? Chris the speller (talk) 15:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Maybe something about his vices and use that as a tie in to the alcoholism on the reservation, along with spousal abuse? Fustigate314159 (talk) 19:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Winona LaDuke
[edit]Where does she appear in the film? I re-watched this the other day, keeping an eye out for her, and didn't spot her in either the film or the credits. ? - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 00:11, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved as requested and per WP:PRECISION -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Skins (2002 film) → Skins (film) – Although there are several movies called "Skin", this is the only one called "Skins". There appears to be a 1997 film called Skins at IMDB, but there is no article about it. There also apparently was supposed to be a movie based on Skins (TV series) at Skins (2011 film) or Skins (2012 film), but apparently it's not happening. Therefore, the year disambiguation is unnecessary. relisted--Mike Cline (talk) 17:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)TimBentley (talk) 20:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment. I still think it's useful to have the year as many people that see an article called "Skins (film)" will expect it to be one based on the TV series. Jenks24 (talk) 15:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Support; disambiguate only as far as necessary. Powers T 19:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 12 February 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Closing early as this seems uncontroversial and necessary. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 14:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Skins (film) → Skins (2002 film) – There's now the article for Skins (2017 film), so per WP:NCF, this should be moved. Lugnuts Precious bodily fluids 14:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support automatic WP:NCF In ictu oculi (talk) 16:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and In ictu oculi. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 23:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Mid-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- C-Class South Dakota articles
- Low-importance South Dakota articles