Talk:Skinny Jeanz and a Mic

Skinny Jeanz and a Mic has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 17, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Mid‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Skinny Jeanz and a Mic/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 12:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References appear to be in order, with no OR.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Article conforms to WP:NPOV.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Article appears to be stable.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Image conforms to requirements.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments:

There should not be anything in the lead not mentioned in the rest of the article. (GA criteria) - In other words, everything that is in the lead must be found in the sections. Please ensure that this is the case.
Jeff Weiss of the newspaper used "Tie Me Down" as an example, noting that its sounds to "a saccharine sappiness and contrived tone that feels at odds with the otherwise organic-sounding album." - "...its sounds to..." Grammar problems.

Summary: I have done some minor copy edit to this article during the course of this review, however, the lead requires work as per comments above. I will allow seven days for these issues to be resolved before making further decisions.

Thank you for all the work to get this article to GA standards. I am satisfied that it now meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it as such. -- S Masters (talk) 04:26, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]