Talk:Skin Trade (film)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Chapman86 (talk · contribs) 06:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Although I'm only now declaring the review, I started looking through and carefully reading/reviewing this article over one hour ago. At first, I wasn't familiar with some of the wording that you used, Metal121, but after using a dictionary, this wasn't an issue. I don't see no reason why this article cannot be passed immediately. The lead is clearly detailed; as is the article throughout. It is also written very well! I've read through the MoS/Film on Wikipedia, and I can see that you've been following this and using it as a guideline yourself. Good Job! I've never immediately passed an article for GA before, but I am doing so this time as I feel it is necessary. The only thing I recommend is that you take this article to the Guild of Copyeditors on Wikipedia. They can give this article a little copyediting if/where needed. If you have any queries, feel free to message. -- Chapman86 07:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
GA list
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: