Talk:Skill set

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Skill set redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2017. The result of the discussion was Redirect to Skill. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 16:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

.

Quo vadis

Firstly thanks to the diligent editors who questioned this stub articles raison d'être- I have posted this list on the deletion discussion page. Here are a few positive suggestions of a future structure :

Make a lead and make an article
Look to a section
- Definition
- History
- Regional differencies
  - Skill set within Wikipedia
    - Skill set of a newbie
    - Skill set of a established editor
    - Skill set of wikipedia specialists
      - Administrators
      - Project coordinators
      - Copy editors
      - Paid wikimedia employees
      - Arbcom
- Skill sets within sectors
  - Manual labourer
  - Artisans
  - Graduates
  - Postgraduates
  - Postdoctorals
  - Diplomats
  - Civil servants
  - Politicians
- Conflicts arising from differing skill sets
- Economic and political implications
  - Conflicts arising from differing skill sets

Now we need to categorise- Category:Human resource management seems a good place to start, and with in that there are three relevant subcategories. If I do get involved further these are directions I would intend to go.

I too share the concern that this article could become all-embracing and massive. So I advise that each section have a lead sentence, and a self-contained body so that will be easy to float off sub-articles in future. ClemRutter (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted comments on User talk:Kim Dent-Brown. I am a little confused at the redirection. ClemRutter (talk) 17:58, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to make a further expansion of the article now, as envisaged by the close. More anon. Andrew D. (talk) 19:04, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]