Talk:Skegby

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nottinghamshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NottinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject NottinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject NottinghamshireNottinghamshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Advert deleted in accordance with policy.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Skegby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003105322/http://www.lindleyancestry.co.uk/lindley_of_skegby_nottinghamshir.htm to http://www.lindleyancestry.co.uk/lindley_of_skegby_nottinghamshir.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Read through the discussion on @Crouch, Swale's talk page re unparished areas and this article is mentioned. The part of the opening sentence that Skegby is . . . a former civil parish in Ashfield District can be read two ways, so I think "former civil parish" is better removed from the opening sentence and placed in the History section. According to sources, Skegby civil parish was abolished in 1935 and Ashfield District came into being in 1974, so Skegby is not a former civil parish in Ashfield District, but by the look of it was at one time a civil parish in Skegby Rural District. Rupples (talk) 17:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On a separate wording issue (last paragraph of History section): On 1 April 1935 the parish was abolished and merged with the parish and urban district of Sutton in Ashfield. Merged doesn't seem the right word to use for an entity that's been abolished. What about something along the lines of "On 1 April 1935, Skegsby ceased to be a separate civil parish; its area became part of Sutton in Ashfield Urban District."

Don't want to boldy alter these while there's ongoing discussion elsewhere. Rupples (talk) 00:40, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Rupples - I think those are fair points. I've made a couple of tweaks accordingly, see if you think they do the job. Stortford (talk) 05:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stortford - lot clearer, thanks. Having mulled this further, agree with keeping the dissolving of the civil parish in the lead as it's an important milestone in Skegby's history. Rupples (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Stortford: and @Rupples: for your very helpful input and for reaching this consensus. This looks great. User:Crouch, Swale now has a suitable form of words that he can use to discuss the abolition of civil parishes in other articles (adapted as appropriate, of course). Best wishes Mertbiol (talk) 15:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]