Talk:Sixty Watt Shaman
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Genre
[edit]There is absolutely nothing that connects this band and their musical performance to the "stoner rock" style.
Therefore, such clssifications are removed. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 22:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
If you've got a pair of eyes which are in working condition you can clearly see that stoner rock was there even before my edit. See? It was denoted as underground rock but it was redirected at stoner rock. But 'underground rock' isn't a valid subgenre. It's an umbrella term. Stoner rock is now sourced anyway. Shallowmead077 (talk) 06:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC)