Talk:Six Assurances

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dead Link

This link no longer toes to a useful page:

State Department’s Official Statement in 2004

If anyone knows where it came from or how to find it again, that would be very useful. Readin (talk) 13:14, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. There's a place called Google on the Internets. http://merln.ndu.edu/archivepdf/china/State/38081.pdf TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had placed the same link below. I didn't realize it had the same information as the dead link originally had. So I've deleted the duplicate. No need to be snarky about pointing out Google when I had found the same link that way and placed it in the same section. Readin (talk) 23:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Text of the assurances

I'm not sure where the text given in the article comes from, but it appears to match exactly the text from the TaiwanDC page I've added to the external links. TaiwanDC is openly partisan in favor of freedom for Taiwanese people. The text from the more neutral Heritage Foundation would probably be more reliable. If no one objects, I'll change to that text. Readin (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See above. TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link you provide above doesn't have the text. Readin (talk) 23:52, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would NEVER call anything coming out of the Heritage Foundation as "neutral." In this case, you can call the list they have as - "reliable & accurate." The foundation itself? Plz~ TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the context of this particular topic, I called the Heritage Foundation "more neutral" than TaiwanDC. Readin (talk) 14:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The version in wiki is the content of the resolution introduced into the House [1] in 2015, the version passed in May 2016 is different, see [2] --Fongyun (talk) 07:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]